To successfully obtain a contract under the Rights of Third Parties Act 1999, a third party must prove that they have obtained consideration under the contract. When a seller is allowed to receive money under the contract, this right is to the seller`s benefit under the contract. The counterparty, the buyer, will have the advantage of receiving goods or services. The “benefit” of the contract may be transferred without the consent of the other party, unless:  Brown-Charbonneau, LLP, “third-party beneficiary,” www.bc-llp.com/third-party-beneficiaries/. In this litigation, “contractual practice” was also relevant. Privity means that only the contracting parties can impose it or be related to it. Given that the councils did not participate in the leases, how could they complain about the way the payments were calculated in accordance with section 26? You didn`t have a standing, apparently. If, for example.B. a contract requires that goods or services be provided before payment, the delivery of goods or services is a precondition for the current right of payment. The same applies to a contract for work for a lump sum to be paid after the completion of the work.
In Trident General Insurance Co Ltd/McNiece Bros Pty Ltd (1988) 165 CLR 107, the High Court expressed doubts as to the extent of the doctrine. Two judges said that the doctrine of contract privilege produced injustice, where third parties intended to take advantage of the contract and could not impose it directly – they said it was time to check the laws – they allowed the intentional beneficiaries in this case to obtain the advantage – considered on commercial reality – it would have been unfair for the insurance company to turn its back on the risk. The problems highlighted by some members of the Court are that the rights of a third-party beneficiary are west if one of the following three things happens: if one thinks of contracts, one assumes that only two parties are involved. But contract law is not always so simple. There may be other parties who may benefit from the provision of a contract and be harmed by its violation. The party-wide party is referred to as a “third-party beneficiary.”  This problem appeared several times up to MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co.